Link Search Menu Expand Document

Kernels continued

Given a compact generator PP of D(A)D(A) and a compact generator QQ of D(B)D(B), we saw last time that PkQP \otimes_k Q is a compact generator for D(AkB)D(A \otimes_k B).

Lemma. If PP and QQ are compact, there is a quasi-isomorphism REnd(P)kREnd(Q)REnd(PkQ)\mathbf{R} \operatorname{End}(P) \otimes_k \mathbf{R} \operatorname{End}(Q) \to \mathbf{R} \operatorname{End}(P \otimes_k Q)

Proof. (Expand to view)

We have RHom(PkQ,PkQ)RHom(P,RHom(Q,PkQ)) \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(P \otimes_k Q, P \otimes_k Q) \cong \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(P, \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,P \otimes_k Q)) As a BB-module, PkQP \otimes_k Q is quasi-isomorphic to a sum of shifts QQ since we are still assuming that kk is field. We know that RHom(Q,Q)RHom(Q,Q) \bigoplus \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q) \to \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,\bigoplus Q) is a quasi-isomorphism. Thus, so is PkRHom(Q,Q)RHom(Q,PkQ) P \otimes_k \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q) \to \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,P \otimes_k Q) Appealing to the same argument shows that RHom(P,P)kRHom(Q,Q)RHom(P,PkRHom(Q,Q)) \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(P,P) \otimes_k \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q) \to \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(P,P \otimes_k \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q)) is a quasi-isomorphism.

Next, we consider the functor MΥ(M):=RHom(P,MLBQ)M \to \Upsilon(M) := \mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(P, M \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B Q) where MM is a AA-BB bimodule. Let Q:=RHom(Q,B)Q^\vee := \mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(Q,B) as a right BB-module. Since QQ is compact, the map QLBQRHom(Q,Q)Q^\vee \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B Q \to \mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q) is a quasi-isomorphism. The object QQ^\vee is a compact generator for D(Bop)D(B^{op}) as ():(perfB)opperfBop(-)^\vee : (\operatorname{perf} B)^{op} \to \operatorname{perf} B^{op} is an equivalence. Thus, if we plug in the PkQP \otimes_k Q^\vee into the functor above we get a quasi-isomorphism between RHom(P,PkQLBQ)RHom(P,P)kRHom(Q,Q)\mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(P, P \otimes_k Q^\vee \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B Q) \sim \mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(P,P) \otimes_k \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q) So we have Υ:D(AkBop)D(RHom(P,P)kRHom(Q,Q)\op)\Upsilon : D(A \otimes_k B^{op}) \to D(\mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(P,P) \otimes_k \mathbf{R} \operatorname{Hom}(Q,Q)^{\op})

Now let’s assume that we have a compact generator PP of D(A)D(A) and we take
B:=REnd(P)B := \mathbf{R}\operatorname{End}(P) Then BkPB \otimes_k P^\vee is a compact generator of D(BAop)D(B \otimes A^{op}). Applying Υ\Upsilon we get an equivalence Υ:D(BkAop)D(BkBop)\Upsilon : D(B \otimes_k A^{op}) \to D(B \otimes_k B^{op}) Thus, there is some object UU for which RHom(B,ULBP)ΔB\mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(B, U \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B P) \sim \Delta_B

Since RHom(B,ULBP)ULBP\mathbf{R}\operatorname{Hom}(B, U \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B P) \cong U \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B P we see that ULBPBU \overset{\mathbf{L}}{\otimes}_B P \cong B as BB-modules. Thus, ΦU:D(A)D(B)\Phi_U : D(A) \to D(B) takes the compact generator PP to the compact generator BB. Moreover, it is fully-faithful on P[l]P[l]. Applying the proposition from the previous class, we have an equivalence.

Theorem. For two dg-algebras AA-BB, if D(A)D(B)D(A) \cong D(B), then there exists a UD(BkAop)U \in D(B \otimes_k A^{op}) such that ΦU:D(A)D(B)\Phi_U : D(A) \to D(B) is equivalence.

Smoothness and properness

We can use bimodules to give a notation of smoothness.

Definition. A dg-algebra AA is called homologically smooth if ΔA\Delta_A is a compact AA-AA dg-bimodule.

Recall the global dimension of a ring is the maximal nn with ExtRn(M,N)0\operatorname{Ext}^n_R(M,N) \neq 0 for some MM and NN.

Lemma. Let RR be a ring. If RR is homologically smooth, then RR has finite global dimension.

Proof. (Expand to view)

Since RR is a compact RR-RR bimodule, then it admits a finite length projective resolution, PΔRP^\bullet \to \Delta_R. Then, PiRMP^i \otimes_R M is a projective module over RR and we know that PRMP^\bullet \otimes_R M has no cohomology except in degree 00 where it is MM. This means we have a projective resolution of MM of length at most the length of the projective resolution of ΔR\Delta_R.

Example. Consider R=k[x]/(x2)R = k[x]/(x^2). We try to resolve ΔR\Delta_R as a bimodule. To start, we have k[y,z]/(y2,z2)k[x]/(x2)0k[y,z]/(y^2,z^2) \to k[x]/(x^2) \to 0 where y,zxy,z \mapsto x. The kernel is generated by (yz)(y-z). Since y2z2=(y+z)(yz)y^2 - z^2 = (y+z)(y-z) We see that (yz)k[y,z]/(y+z,y2,z2)k[x]/(x2)(y-z) \cong k[y,z]/(y+z,y^2,z^2) \cong k[x]/(x^2) This immediately implies that Extk[y,z]/(y2,z2)l(k[x]/(x2),k[x]/(x2))0\operatorname{Ext}^l_{k[y,z]/(y^2,z^2)}(k[x]/(x^2),k[x]/(x^2)) \neq 0 for all l0l \geq 0. In particular, ΔR\Delta_R cannot be perfect, hence compact. So RR is not homologically smooth.

Definition. A dg-algebra AA over a commutative ring kk is proper over kk if AA is perfect as a kk dg-module (chain complex).

In particular, we need that Hi(A)=0H^i(A) = 0 for all but finitely many ii.